Sj. Maxson et Mr. Riggs, HABITAT USE AND NEST SUCCESS OF OVERWATER NESTING DUCKS IN WESTCENTRAL MINNESOTA, The Journal of wildlife management, 60(1), 1996, pp. 108-119
Where several duck species coexist, managers need knowledge of species
-specific similarities and differences in patterns of nest habitat use
and nest success. We searched overwater habitat (i.e., rooted stands
of cattail [Typha spp.], bulrush [Scirpus spp.], or phragmites [Phragm
ites australis], floating mats of sedge [Carex spp.] and/or cattail, w
et sedge/grass [Poaceae] meadows, and willow [Salix spp.] swamps) in w
estcentral Minnesota and located 155 overwater nests of 5 duck species
. Nests were in wetlands of 0.2 to 32.0 ha that were 20 to 100% covere
d by overwater habitat. A canonical discriminant function analysis cla
rified some similarities and differences among the 5 species in their
nest habitat use. Some individuals of each species, but especially red
heads (Aythya americana) and ruddy ducks (Oxyura jamaicensis), nested
in relatively more open, larger, deeper type 4 wetlands with cover nea
r nests dominated by cattails and lacking sedges. Most mallards (Anas
platyrhynchos) and ring-necked ducks (Aythya collaris) nested in small
er, shallower type 2 and 3 wetlands which had a high proportion of the
basin covered by overwater habitat and at sites where overwater veget
ation, particularly sedges, was dense and nests were well screened. Ma
llards and ring-necked ducks were the only species nesting in type 2 w
etlands or on floating sedge mats and except for 2 canvasback (Aythya
valisineria) nests, were the only species to use floating cattail mars
as nest sites. Canvasbacks typically nested in type 3 and 4 wetlands
of intermediate size, depth, and proportion of basin covered by overwa
ter habitat. Their nests were at sites of moderate vegetation density
and were less well screened by vegetation than those of the other spec
ies. Mallards had lower nest success (3.8%) than ring-necked ducks (34
.1%) or all diving ducks combined (26.5%) (alpha = 0.10). Of 105 nests
that failed to hatch, 74.3% were depredated while 13.3% were flooded.
Multiple logistic regression analyses indicated that none of the 11 h
abitat characteristics measured at our nest sites predicted whether a
nest would hatch or be depredated (all P > 0.20).