Hm. Narayana et al., ULTRASOUND VERSUS PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION IN STAGING CARCINOMA OF THE MOBILE TONGUE, Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 110(1), 1996, pp. 43-47
Surgical therapy for early lesions of the tongue should have the poten
tial to be both oncologically sound and easy to rehabilitate. Obviousl
y, the amount of tongue left behind after surgery is proportional to t
he post-operative function. Hence accurate mapping of the diseased ton
gue is of paramount importance in order to limit or extend the resecti
on margins. We have evaluated the use of ultrasound in carcinoma of th
e tongue, and also compared its relative accuracy with physical examin
ation for determining the extent of growth, keeping the histopathologi
cal size as a gold standard. We found that ultrasound is more accurate
in detecting T-2 and T-3 tumours than T-1 lesions. intraoral sonograp
hic mappng may be the answer for such small lesions. In addition, ultr
asonography is beneficial in showing spread to contiguous areas of the
tongue. However, post-radiation fibrosis and frank residual disease w
ere not differentiated accurately by ultrasound. Thus ultrasonography
can be an effective investigative tool and together with physical exam
ination it can increase diagnostic accuracy leading to precise surgery
for carcinoma of the tongue.