Following proposals in 1987 and 1988, several medical journals have pr
ovided more informative abstracts (''structured abstracts'') for artic
les of clinical interest, Structured abstracts for original studies re
quire authors to systematically disclose the objective, basic research
design, clinical setting, participants, interventions (if any), main
outcome measurements, results, and conclusions; and for literature rev
iews the objective, data sources, methods of study selection, data ext
raction and synthesis, and conclusions, More informative abstracts of
this kind can facilitate peer review before publication, assist clinic
al readers to find articles that are both scientifically sound and app
licable to their practices, and allow more precise computerized litera
ture searches, We review the feasibility, acceptability, and dissemina
tion of structured abstracts, reassess the underlying strategy, and de
scribe modifications of the approach, This innovation can aid communic
ation from scientists to clinicians, and other clinical journals are i
nvited to join this effort.