Be. Smith et Tw. Guyette, PRESSURE-FLOW DIFFERENCES IN PERFORMANCE DURING PRODUCTION OF THE CV SYLLABLES VERTICAL-BAR-PI-VERTICAL-BAR AND VERTICAL-BAR-PA-VERTICAL-BAR, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 33(1), 1996, pp. 74-76
Inconsistencies in velopharyngeal function were observed to have been
reported in presure-flow reports. This article introduces our findings
from a sample of pressure-flow records and discusses possible implica
tions for management. A retrospective review of the pressure-flow reco
rds for 51 patients was completed, All patients had been evaluated at
the Craniofacial Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Records we
re selected based on the following criteria: patients were referred fo
r evaluation of velopharyngeal function and had no secondary surgeries
on the velopharyngeal mechanism, no fistulae, no neurologic disorders
, and no compensatory articulations, At the time of testing, patients
ranged in age from 4 to 38 years with most being under 18 years of age
, Velopharyngeal orifice areas were obtained using the pressure-flow t
echnique during repeated CV syllables, including lpil and lpal, Our re
sults show that 8 of 51 patients exhibited a specific type of inconsis
tent velopharyngeal function (i.e., they exhibited velopharyngeal clos
ing during lpal repetitions, but had openings during lpil repetitions)
, The reverse finding was not observed among any of the 51 patients, W
e concluded that the velopharyngeal incompetence observed during utter
ances involving lil may have been due to the downward pull on the pala
te of the palatoglossus muscle, which could not be counteracted by the
already maximized levator activity in borderline patients.