A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH FK506 FOR INDUCTION AND RESCUE THERAPY AFTER PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION

Citation
Rwg. Gruessner et al., A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH FK506 FOR INDUCTION AND RESCUE THERAPY AFTER PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION, Transplantation, 61(2), 1996, pp. 261-273
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology,Surgery,Transplantation
Journal title
ISSN journal
00411337
Volume
61
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
261 - 273
Database
ISI
SICI code
0041-1337(1996)61:2<261:AMAOTF>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Between May 1, 1993 and April 5, 1995, 154 pancreas allograft recipien ts at 9 institutions were given FK506 posttransplant. Three groups wer e studied: (1) recipients given FK506 initially for induction and main tenance therapy (n=82), (2) recipients switched to FR506 for antirejec tion or rescue therapy (n=61), and (3) recipients converted to FK506 f or other reasons (n=11). Of 82 patients in the induction group, 7 (9%) had simultaneous bone marrow (BM) and pancreas-kidney (SPK-BM) transp lants, 54 (66%) had SPK transplants without BM, 14 (17%) had pancreas transplants alone (PTA), and 7 (9%) had pancreas after previous kidney transplants (PAK), All but 1 recipient was given quadruple immunosupp ression (anti-T cell agents plus azathioprine and prednisone) for indu ction. The median FK506 starting dose was 4 mg/day p.o.; the median av erage FK506 blood level, 12 ng/ml. The most common side effects were n eurotoxicity (16%), nephrotoxicity (13%), and gastrointestinal toxicit y (9%). New-onset diabetes mellitus requiring permanent insulin therap y did not occur. Of 61 transplants in the rescue group, 44 (72%) were SPK, 11 (18%) PTA, and 6 (10%) PAK. All but 3 (95%) of the recipients had been on cyclosporine-azathioprine-prednisone triple immunosuppress ion before substitution of FK506 for cyclosporine; 46% of the recipien ts had one, and 54% greater than or equal to 2, rejection episodes pre conversion. The most common side effects were nephrotoxicity (25%), ne urotoxicity (23%), and gastrointestinal toxicity (21%). Two recipients were reconverted to cyclosporine because of transient hyperglycemia, and one recipient is on insulin. In the induction group, patient survi val at 6 months was 90% for SPK, 100% for PTA, and 100% for PAK. Accor ding to a matched-pair analysis, pancreas graft survival for SPK recip ients at 6 months was 87% for FK506 versus 70% for cyclosporine recipi ents (P=0.04); for PTA recipients, 84% versus 66% (P=n.s.); and for PA K recipients, 80% versus 14% (P=0.11). When technical failures and dea th with functioning grafts were censored, pancreas graft survival rema ined significantly better in the FK506 group. The incidence of first r eversible rejection episodes by 6 months in FK506 recipients was 35% f or SPK, 40% for PTA, and 20% for PAK. Of 75 pancreas grafts, 64 are cu rrently functioning; in 5 recipients the pancreas failed (1 from rejec tion); 6 recipients died with a functioning pancreas graft. There were 3 posttransplant lymphomas (all EBV-positive); 2 recipients died and 1 is alive after subtotal colectomy and transplant pancreatectomy, In the antirejection rescue group, patient survival rates at 6 months wer e 91% for SPK, 100% for PTA, and 80% for PAK (P=n.s.). Pancreas graft survival rates at 6 months were 90% for SPK, 72% for PTA, and 40% for PAK. The incidence of first reversible rejection episodes after conver sion to FK506 at 6 months was 44% in SPK, 54% in PTA, and 50% in PAK. Of 61 pancreas grafts, 51 are currently functioning; in 7 recipients t he pancreas failed (5 from rejection); 3 recipients died with a functi oning graft, There were no posttransplant lymphomas in the rescue grou p. This multicenter survey shows that FK506 in pancreas transplantatio n is associated with (1) a low rate of graft loss from rejection when used for induction therapy, (2) a high rate of graft salvage when used for rescue or rejection therapy, and (3) a very low rate of new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, These encouraging results are ta rnished by 3 posttransplant lymphomas in the induction group; a possib le explanation is overimmunosuppression, but further (randomized) stud ies are necessary to analyze the long-term risk-benefit ratio of FR506 after pancreas transplantation.