DESIGN AND COMPREHENSIVE CONFORMATIONAL STUDIES OF TYR(1)-CYCLO(D-PEN(2)-GLY(3)-PHE(4)-L-3-MPT(5)) AND TYR(1)-CYCLO(D-PEN(2)-GLY(3)-PHE(4)-D-3-MPT(5)) - NOVEL CONFORMATIONALLY CONSTRAINED OPIOID-PEPTIDES
Gv. Nikiforovich et al., DESIGN AND COMPREHENSIVE CONFORMATIONAL STUDIES OF TYR(1)-CYCLO(D-PEN(2)-GLY(3)-PHE(4)-L-3-MPT(5)) AND TYR(1)-CYCLO(D-PEN(2)-GLY(3)-PHE(4)-D-3-MPT(5)) - NOVEL CONFORMATIONALLY CONSTRAINED OPIOID-PEPTIDES, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(5), 1996, pp. 959-969
Two compounds, Tyr(1)-cyclo(D-Pen(2)-Gly(3)-Phe(4)-L-3-Mpt(5)) (DPMPT;
3-Mpt is trans-3-mercaptoproline) and Tyr(1)-cyclo(D-Pen(2)-Gly(3)-Ph
e(4)-D-3-Mpt(5)) (DPDMPT), were designed employing energy calculations
. Geometrical comparison showed that some low-energy 3D structures of
DPMPT and DPDMPT are compatible with the model for the delta-receptor-
bound conformation of the well-known delta-selective DPDPE peptide Tyr
(1)-cyclo(D-Pen(2)-Gly(3)-Phe(4)-D-Pen(5), which was proposed by us ea
rlier. DPMPT and DPDMPT were tested for their binding to delta-, mu- a
nd kappa-opioid receptors. The corresponding K-i values were 3.5, 68,
and >5000 nM for DPMPT, and 103.7, >5000, and >5000 nM for DPDMPT, res
pectively. Independent studies by homo- and heteronuclear NMR spectros
copy and energy calculations showed that DPMPT exists in DMSO solution
in conformational equilibrium among several backbone conformations wi
th the same type of 3D structure for the cyclic moiety, but with somew
hat different conformers of the acyclic part of the molecule and two t
ypes of rotamers for the D-Pen side chain, namely, t and g(-). For DPD
MPT, energy calculations combined with the NMR data suggest that any o
ne out of four low-energy conformers belonging to the same type of the
backbone of the cyclic moiety may be a possible candidate for the DPD
MPT conformer in DMSO. The DPDMPT structure revealed by X-ray crystall
ography showed remarkable similarity to DPDMPT solution conformations.
The determined solution conformations of both compounds were compared
to their suggested delta-receptor-bound conformers. Results of compar
ison showed that all four of the possible solution conformations of DP
DMPT are nonsimilar to the DPDMPT delta-receptor-bound conformation, w
hereas two of the possible solution conformations of DPMPT are compati
ble with the suggested delta-receptor-bound conformation of DPMPT. Thi
s finding can explain the difference in binding of DPMPT and DPDMPT to
delta-opioid receptors by a suggestion that the delta-receptor-bound
conformation of DPMPT already preexists in solution, whereas solution
conformations of DPDMPT should be more significantly distorted to matc
h the delta-receptor-bound conformation of DPDMPT.