STOMATAL CONTROL BY FED OR ENDOGENOUS XYLEM ABA IN SUNFLOWER - INTERPRETATION OF CORRELATIONS BETWEEN LEAF WATER POTENTIAL AND STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE IN ANISOHYDRIC SPECIES
F. Tardieu et al., STOMATAL CONTROL BY FED OR ENDOGENOUS XYLEM ABA IN SUNFLOWER - INTERPRETATION OF CORRELATIONS BETWEEN LEAF WATER POTENTIAL AND STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE IN ANISOHYDRIC SPECIES, Plant, cell and environment, 19(1), 1996, pp. 75-84
The stomatal conductance of several anisohydric plant species, includi
ng field-grown sunflower, frequently correlates with leaf water potent
ial (Psi(l)), suggesting that chemical messages travelling from roots
to shoots may not play an important role in stomatal control. We have
performed a series of experiments in which evaporative demand, soil wa
ter status and ABA origin (endogenous or artificial) were varied in or
der to analyse stomatal control. Sunflower plants were subjected to a
range of soil water potentials under contrasting air vapour pressure d
eficits (VPD, from 0.5 to 2.5 kPa) in the field, in the glasshouse or
in a humid chamber. Sunflower plants were also fed through the xylem w
ith varying concentrations of artificial ABA, in the glasshouse and in
the field. Finally, detached leaves were fed directly with varying co
ncentrations of ABA under three contrasting VPDs. A unique relationshi
p between stomatal conductance (g(s)) and the concentration of ABA in
the xylem sap (xylem [ABA]) was observed in all cases. In contrast, th
e relationship between Psi(l) and g(s) varied substantially among expe
riments. Its slope was positive for droughted plants and negative for
ABA-fed whole plants or detached leaves, and also varied appreciably w
ith air VPD. All observed relationships could be modelled on the basis
of the assumption that Psi(l) had no controlling effect on g(s). We c
onclude that stomatal control depended only on the concentration of AB
A in the xylem sap, and that Psi(l) was controlled by water flux throu
gh the plant (itself controlled by stomatal conductance). The possibil
ity is also raised that differences in stomatal 'strategy' between iso
hydric plants (such as maize, where daytime Psi(l) does not vary appre
ciably with soil water status) and anisohydric plants (such as sunflow
er) may be accounted for by the degree of influence of Psi(l) on stoma
tal control, for a given level of xylem [ABA]. We propose that statist
ical relationships between Psi(l) and g(s) are only observed when Psi(
l) has no controlling action on stomatal behaviour.