Jm. Wild et Sm. Farabaugh, ORGANIZATION OF AFFERENT AND EFFERENT PROJECTIONS OF THE NUCLEUS BASALIS PROSENCEPHALI IN A PASSERINE, TAENIOPYGIA-GUTTATA, Journal of comparative neurology, 365(2), 1996, pp. 306-328
The connections of nucleus basalis (NB) of the rostral forebrain of th
e zebra finch were investigated electrophysiologically and with antero
grade and retrograde tracing methods to determine their functional org
anization, the sources of their pontine afferents, and the targets of
their telencephalic efferents. The nucleus was found to be partitioned
into three major components, a rostral lingual part that received a h
ypoglossal projection via a lateral subnucleus of the principal sensor
y trigeminal nucleus (PrV), a middle beak part that received a trigemi
nal projection via a medial subnucleus of PrV, and a caudal auditory p
art that received a short latency auditory projection via the intermed
iate nucleus of the lateral lemniscus. Beak NE also received a project
ion from a paralateral lemniscal nucleus, and the dorsocaudal part of
auditory NE and the medially adjacent neostriatum also received a proj
ection from a lateral subnucleus of the superior vestibular nucleus (V
S). The efferent projections of each of the three major parts of NE we
re mainly to the adjacent neostriatum frontale (NF), which then provid
ed projections to the lobus parolfactorius (exclusive of area X), the
lateral archistriatum intermedium (Ail), and the lateral neostriatum c
audale (NCl). Ail received a projection from NCI and provided terminal
fields to the contralateral NCl and the NF. The major projections of
Ail, however, descended bilaterally through the brainstem via the occi
pitomesencephalic tracts, with dense terminations in the medial spirif
orm nucleus and with extensive bilateral terminations throughout the l
ateral reticular formation of the pens and medulla. For the most part,
jaw, tongue, and tracheosyringeal motor nuclei did not receive termin
ations. The results suggest that NE in zebra finch, like NE in pigeon
and duck, is likely to be a major component of trigeminal sensorimotor
circuitry involved in feeding and in other oral-manipulative behavior
s. Results also show that the auditory component of NE is not directly
linked to the vocal control system at telencephalic levels, but the p
ossibility remains that the lingual, beak, and auditory parts of NE pl
ay a role in vocalization by multisynaptic influences on cranial nerve
motor nuclei innervating various parts of the vocal tract. (C) 1996 W
iley-Liss, Inc.