The rate-determining steps in the phosphorylation of four tyrosine-con
taining peptides by the kinase domain of the nonreceptor tyrosine prot
ein kinase v-fps were measured using viscosometric methods. The peptid
es were phosphorylated by a fusion protein of glutathione-S-transferas
e and the kinase domain of v-fps (GST-kin) and the initial velocities
were determined by a coupled enzyme assay. Peptides I (EEEIYEEIE), Il
(EAEIYEAIE), and III (DADIYDAID) were phosphorylated by GST-kin with s
imilar kinetic constants. The viscosogens, glycerol and sucrose, were
found to have intermediate effects on k(cat) and no effect on k(cat)/K
-peptide for the phosphorylation of these three peptides. The data are
interpreted according to the Stokes-Einstein equation and a simple th
ree-step mechanism involving substrate binding, phosphoryl group trans
fer, and net product release. Two competitive inhibitors (EAEIFEAIE an
d DADIFDAID) exhibited Kr values that are 6-10-fold higher than the K-
peptide values for their analogous peptide substrates. The data imply
that peptides I-III are in rapid equilibrium with the enzyme and that
k(cat) is partially limited by both phosphoryl group transfer (40-100
s(-1)) and product release (17-22 s(-1)). GST-kin phosphorylates pepti
de IV (R(5)AENLEYamide) with a low K-m (100 mu M) and a k(cat) that is
40-fold lower than that for peptide I. No effect of solvent viscosity
was observed for the phosphorylation of this peptide on either k(cat)
or k(cat)/K-peptide. This suggests that highly viscous solutions do n
ot perturb structure and that the rate-determining step for this poor
substrate is phosphoryl group transfer. The data indicate that the kin
ase domain of v-fps phosphorylates its best substrate with a chemical
rate constant that is at least 5-fold lower than that for the serine-s
pecific cAMP-dependent protein kinase and its best substrate LRRASLG (
Adams & Taylor, 1992). Interestingly, both enzymes exhibit a similar a
ffinity for their substrates and both enzymes release their products a
t a similar rate. This implies that the differences in catalytic effic
iency between serine- and tyrosine-specific protein kinases lie exclus
ively in the rate constants for phosphoryl group transfer and not in s
ubstrate absorption or product desorption.