Gcw. England et al., ROMIFIDINE AS A PREMEDICANT TO PROPOFOL INDUCTION AND INFUSION ANESTHESIA IN THE DOG, Journal of Small Animal Practice, 37(2), 1996, pp. 79-83
The effects of premedication with four different intravenous doses of
romifidine (20, 40, 80 and 120 mu g/kg bodyweight) and a saline placeb
o were compared in a group of 20 adult beagles of both sexes, undergoi
ng anaesthesia with propofol for a clinical dental procedure. Anaesthe
sia was induced 10 minutes after premedication and maintained by intra
venous infusion of propofol for a period of 30 minutes. Romifidine had
a marked synergistic effect with propofol and reduced the required in
duction and infusion doses by more than 60 per cent for a standard lev
el of anaesthesia; the synergistic effect was dose related. Following
premedication, propofol. produced no significant alteration of respira
tory rate, heart rate or rectal temperature. Anaesthesia was found to
be more stable following romifidine premedication at all doses studied
. The quality of induction was unaltered by the dose of the romifidine
. Recovery from anaesthesia was smooth and of a similar quality in all
cases. There were no differences in the recovery times between the un
premedicated group and the dogs premedicated with any dose of romifidi
ne studied. There were no adverse effects noted following this anaesth
etic regimen. The marked dose-related synergism with propofol inductio
n and infusion anaesthesia is relevant should romifidine be used in th
e dog in clinical veterinary practice.