Jj. Sanz et J. Moreno, MASS-LOSS IN BROODING FEMALE PIED FLYCATCHERS FICEDULA-HYPOLEUCA - NOEVIDENCE FOR REPRODUCTIVE STRESS, Journal of avian biology, 26(4), 1995, pp. 313-320
In altricial birds, mass loss among brooding females may reflect nutri
tional stress due to reduced time available for foraging or the cost o
f warming young. Alternatively, it may be an adaptive adjustment to fu
ture energetic demands. To distinguish between these hypotheses we con
ducted a brood replacement experiment with Pied Flycatchers. Female Pi
ed Flycatchers brood their young during the first 7 days after hatchin
g. Nine broods with chicks 4 days old were replaced by broods that hat
ched on the day of manipulation. Females of the first group thus brood
ed for a longer period (''double brooding''), while the second group o
f females experienced a shortened brooding period (''non-brooding'').
Other broods were not manipulated. Chicks were returned to their origi
nal nest after one week. Females adjusted their brooding and feeding r
esponse to the age of the brood being cared for. ''Double brooding'' f
emales lost significantly less mass than control females during the fi
rst 8 days after hatching of their brood, although there was no differ
ence between control and ''non-brooding'' females. There was no differ
ence between treatments in nestling growth and survival. Total mass lo
ss during the nestling period in the three treatments was equal. Femal
e mass loss during the brooding period is not due to brooding effort,
and presumably not a symptom of reproductive stress.