EVALUATION OF SOIL BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES AS POTENTIAL BIOINDICATORS OF SOIL HEALTH

Citation
Ce. Pankhurst et al., EVALUATION OF SOIL BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES AS POTENTIAL BIOINDICATORS OF SOIL HEALTH, Australian journal of experimental agriculture, 35(7), 1995, pp. 1015-1028
Citations number
63
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience",Agriculture
ISSN journal
08161089
Volume
35
Issue
7
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1015 - 1028
Database
ISI
SICI code
0816-1089(1995)35:7<1015:EOSBPA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Two long-term field trials in South Australia were used to detect and characterise changes in soil biological properties that were a consequ ence of different agricultural management. The properties examined wer e total bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes; total pseudomonads; cellul olytic bacteria and fungi; mycorrhizal fungi; plant root pathogens (Ga eumannomyces graminis var. tritici, Rhizoctonia solani, Pythium irregu lare); bacterial-feeding protozoa; soil mesofauna (collembola and acar i); earthworms; microbial biomass; C and N mineralisation; in situ CO2 respiration; cellulose decomposition; acid soil enzyme activity (pept idase, phosphatase, sulfatase). The sensitivity of these biological pr operties was assessed to tillage (no-tillage v. conventional cultivati on), stubble management (stubble retained v. stubble harvested), crop rotation (continuous wheat v. wheat-sown pasture), and N fertilisation (nil v. 80 kg N/ha applied during the crop phase). Tillage, stubble m anagement, crop relation, and N fertilisation significantly (P<0.01) a ffected C mineralisation and microbial biomass. Tillage with stubble m anagement significantly affected root pathogenic fungi, protozoa, coll embola, earthworms, and cellulose decomposition. Crop rotation affecte d mycorrhizal fungi, protozoa, and soil peptidase activity, and N fert iliser had a significant effect on mycorrhizal fungi, protozoa, and ce llulose decomposition. As these biological properties are responsive t o agricultural management, they may have potential as bioindicators. T otal bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes, cellulose-decomposing bacteri a and fungi, soil phosphatase and sulfatase activity, and N mineralisa tion were less affected by these treatments and may therefore have lim ited potential as bioindicators.