Ms. Olson et al., A TEST TO ESTIMATE VO2 MAX IN FEMALES USING AEROBIC DANCE, HEART-RATE, BMI, AND AGE, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 35(3), 1995, pp. 159-168
Objective. The purpose of this investigation was to develop a sub-maxi
mal exercise test for estimating VO(2)max utilizing aerobic dance. Exp
erimental Design. One hundred females between the ages 18 to 40 yr ser
ved as the subjects for test validation, The subjects completed a trea
dmill test to determine VO(2)max and were assessed for heart rate (HR)
response to a bout of aerobic dance, The data associated with respons
es to treadmill exercise and the aerobic dance test, in conjunction wi
th descriptive variables (e.g., age, BMI) were utilized in the validat
ion of the multiple regression model. Measures. Reliability was determ
ined by correlation and paired ''t''-tests of the aerobic dance routin
e test and retest trials, The construction of the multiple regression
equation, via forward entry analysis, and the cross-validation of the
regression equation were completed to ensure the validity and reliabil
ity of the protocol in accurately estimating VO(2)max. Results. Test,
retest reliability for the dance-exercise routine was demonstrated (r=
0.98). Moreover, no significant differences were shown between the HR
responses for the test and retest trials, The multiple regression anal
ysis yielded a three variable multiple prediction equation for estimat
ing VO(2)max (R=0.84; SEE, 5.5 ml . kg(-1). min(-1)). The three variab
les were the HR response to four min of aerobic dance (HR4), body mass
index (BMI), and age (years), Cross-validation of the aerobic dance t
est was determined with a second group of 50 female subjects (R=0.83;
SEE, 5.5 ml . kg(-1). min(-1)). Additionally, the application of the v
alidation group regression equation to the cross-validation group yiel
ded a comparable R of 0.82. Comparison of the predicted values for VO(
2)max from both equations also yielded a highly significant invariance
coefficient of 0.96. Finally, the results of ''t''-tests between the
observed and predicted mean values for VO(2)max revealed no significan
t difference (p>0.05). Therefore, the final prediction equation, based
on collapsing the means associated with the validation and cross vali
dation samples (n=150), was: VO(2)max (ml . kg(-1). min(-1))=130.18-(0
.38 HR4)-(0.81 * BMI)-(0.27 * Age); R=0.84, SEE=5.5 ml . kg(-1). min
(-1). Conclusions. These results indicate that a four minute aerobic d
ance test provides a valid and reliable sub-maximal protocol for estim
ating VO(2)max and providing an index of aerobic fitness in apparently
healthy 18 to 40 yr old females.