Y. Meckel et al., PHYSIOLOGICAL-CHARACTERISTICS OF FEMALE 100 METER SPRINTERS OF DIFFERENT PERFORMANCE LEVELS, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 35(3), 1995, pp. 169-175
The purpose of this study was to compare physiological characteristics
of three different levels of 100 m female sprinters. The 30 subjects
in this study (20 female track athletes and 10 recreationally trained
females) were assigned, according to their 100 m running time, to one
of three different groups: ''Fast'' (11.8 +/- 0.1 sec), ''Average'' (1
2.7 +/- 0.1) and ''Slow'' (14.2 +/- 0.1 sec). All subjects were tested
for performance in the Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT), strength (squat
exercise), fat % (hydrostatic weighing), reaction time, flexibility (
sit-and-reach test), aerobic power (peak VO2) and running skill. The d
ata was analyzed by one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc
Tukey test, which was performed on each variable to find differences
between the groups. The ANOVA indicated significant differences among
all three groups for performance in the Wingate Anaerobic Test and rel
ative strength. Significant differences in fat % and running skill wer
e found between the fast and the slow groups and between the average a
nd the slow groups. However, no significant difference in fat % and ru
nning skill existed between the fast and the average groups. The diffe
rences in reaction time were significant only between the fast and the
average groups. No two groups were significantly different from each
other for flexibility and peak VO2. Pearson correlation coefficients (
r) were calculated to determine the relationships between the 100m run
ning time and each of the variables tested. Significant and negative c
orrelations were found between the 100m running time and skill, relati
ve strength, and performance in the WAnT. Significant and positive cor
relations were found between running time and fat %. No significant co
rrelations were found between running time and peak VO2 reaction time
and flexibility. Stepwise regression analysis indicated that the combi
nation of performance in the WAnT and strength provided the most effic
ient (R=0.92) prediction of 100 m run times. This study demonstrated t
hat the main difference among female sprinters of different performanc
e levels lies in their ability to produce muscular power, strength and
running technique. Other physiological components, such as flexibilit
y, peak VO2, and reaction time do not differ among female sprinters of
different performance levels as represented in the tested groups.