M. Gisselbrecht et al., CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND RESULTS OF THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN OLDER PATIENTS WITH MASSIVE PULMONARY-EMBOLISM - A COMPARISON WITH NON-ELDERLYPATIENTS, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44(2), 1996, pp. 189-193
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical presentation and effectiveness of th
rombolytic therapy in older patients suffering from massive pulmonary
embolism. DESIGN: Analysis of a previously reported study of patients
with massive pulmonary embolism using a dichotomous classification of
age. SETTING: A medical intensive care unit in one hospital center. PA
RTICIPANTS: All subjects had massive pulmonary embolism as evidenced b
y scintigraphic and/or angiographic assessment. The 54 patients includ
ed in this study were divided into two groups according to age: 28 pat
ients were less than 75 years old and 26 patients were 75 years old or
older. INTERVENTION: All patients received a bolus regimen of single-
chain recombinant tissue-type plasminogen and were subsequently treate
d by heparin and warfarin. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical symptoms at admissio
n, resolution of scintigraphic vascular obstruction, death rate, hemor
rhagic complications, recurrent pulmonary embolism, and long-term foll
ow-up were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Clinical symptoms at
admission were similar in both groups. The mean absolute improvement
in the lung scan perfusion defect, the rate of major bleeding, and the
long-term evolution were not statistically different between older an
d younger patients. CONCLUSION: Clinical symptoms, including hemodynam
ic condition, did not differ between elderly and nonelderly patients s
uffering from massive pulmonary embolism. Old age should not preclude
thrombolytic therapy in massive pulmonary embolism, provided there is
no other contraindication for thrombolytic treatment.