Tw. Ryschon et al., RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SKELETAL-MUSCLE INTRACELLULAR IONIZED MAGNESIUM AND MEASUREMENTS OF BLOOD MAGNESIUM, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 127(2), 1996, pp. 207-213
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Laboratory Technology","Medicine, General & Internal
The current laboratory approach to assessing magnesium status is based
on determining the concentration of total Mg ((Mg)) in serum or plasm
a. This strategy is problematic in that the amount of Mg in blood is l
ess than 1% of total body Mg and does not accurately reflect (Mg) in o
ther tissues, Furthermore, the (Mg) of blood does not distinguish biol
ogically active, ionized Mg from the bound fraction, The goal of this
study was to determine intracellular ionized Mg ((MS(++))(i)) of skele
tal muscle in vivo and to compare results with the (Mg) of blood const
ituents, (Mg++)(i) was determined in resting skeletal muscle by using
phosphorus 31 magnetic resonance (P-31-MR) spectroscopy. (Mg) was meas
ured in serum (S(Mg)), serum ultrafiltrate (UF(Mg)), mononuclear blood
cells (MBC(Mg)), and red blood cells (RBC(Mg)) by using atomic absorp
tion spectroscopy or a colorimetric assay, In a sample of 60 healthy a
dult subjects, skeletal muscle (Mg++), = 557 +/- 97 mu mol/L (mean a S
D); S(Mg) = 0.78 +/- 0.09 mmol/L; UF(Mg) = 0.60 +/- 0.12 mmol/L; MBC(M
g) = 13.8 +/- 2.3 mmol/L; and, RBC(Mg) = 1.92 +/- 0.33 mmol/L, A signi
ficant negative correlation was found between (Mg++)(i) and S(Mg) (r =
-0.43, p < 0.05). S(Mg) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) and (Mg++)
(i) significantly higher (p < 0.05) in women than in men, but neither
was related to age. These findings provide new insight into the relati
onship between blood Mg measures and (Mg++)(i) of the largest soft tis
sue mass of the human body.