QUANTITATION OF THE AREA OF OVERLAP BETWEEN 2ND-DERIVATIVE AMIDE-I INFRARED-SPECTRA TO DETERMINE THE STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY OF A PROTEIN IN DIFFERENT STATES
Bs. Kendrick et al., QUANTITATION OF THE AREA OF OVERLAP BETWEEN 2ND-DERIVATIVE AMIDE-I INFRARED-SPECTRA TO DETERMINE THE STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY OF A PROTEIN IN DIFFERENT STATES, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 85(2), 1996, pp. 155-158
Maintaining a nativelike structure of protein pharmaceuticals during l
yophilization is an important aspect of formulation. infrared spectros
copy can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of formulations in prot
ecting the secondary structural integrity of proteins in the dried sol
id. This necessitates making quantitative comparisons of the overall s
imilarity of infrared spectra in the conformationally sensitive amide
I region. We initially used the correlation coefficient r, as defined
by Prestrelski et al. (Biophys. J. 1993, 65, 661-671), for this quanti
tation. Occasionally, we noticed that the r value did not agree with a
visual assessment of the spectral similarity. In some cases this was
due to an offset in baselines, which led artifactually to an unreasona
bly low r value. Conversely, if the spectra were baseline corrected an
d there existed a large similarity between peak positions, but differe
nces in relative peak heights, the r value would be unreasonably high.
Our approach to avoiding these problems is to use area-normalized sec
ond-derivative spectra. We have found that quantitating the area of ov
erlap between area-normalized spectra provides a reliable, objective m
ethod to compare overall spectral similarity. In the current report, w
e demonstrate this method with selected protein spectra, which were ta
ken from experiments where unfolding was induced by lyophilization or
guanidine hydrochloride, and artificial data sets. With this analysis,
we document how problems associated with calculation of the correlati
on coefficient, r, are avoided.