Vs. Sottiurai et al., SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF BRACHIOAXILLARY-SUBCLAVIAN VEIN OCCLUSION, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 11(2), 1996, pp. 225-229
Objective: The possibility of using Ring PTFE graft as venous bypass t
o preserve arteriovenous graft function and reduce upper extremity swe
lling. Methods: Twenty-two patients with stenosis/occlusion of the bra
nchial-axillary-subclavian vein segment in haemodialysis patients (n =
19) and patients with penetration injury (n = 3) who were not candida
tes for balloon angioplasty were treated with ring PTFE venous bypass
in renal patients and jugular to axillary vein transposition for traum
a patients and followed for 10-87 months (mean 31) using venography, D
oppler analysis and Duplex scanning. Results: There was no death or ne
urologic deficit resulting from the venous bypass. Resolution of swell
ing occurred in 8-48 h. 19/22 (86%) of the bypasses and 3/3 transposit
ions remained patent after a mean follow-up of 31 months (10-87) month
s. The attrition was due to AV graft occlusion (n = 2) and infection r
equiring graft removal (n = 1). Conclusions: Ring PTFE graft is an acc
eptable venous bypass for branchial-axillary-subclavian stenosis/occlu
sion to reduce arm swelling and preserve the function of AV grafts in
patients with lesions not amendable with balloon angioplasty or thromb
olytic therapy. Jugular-axillary transposition is inappropriate for re
nal patients.