OBSERVER VARIATION IN THE INTERPRETATION OF INTRAARTERIAL ANGIOGRAMS AND THE RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DECISIONS ABOUT CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY

Citation
Gr. Young et al., OBSERVER VARIATION IN THE INTERPRETATION OF INTRAARTERIAL ANGIOGRAMS AND THE RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DECISIONS ABOUT CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 60(2), 1996, pp. 152-157
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Neurology
ISSN journal
00223050
Volume
60
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
152 - 157
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3050(1996)60:2<152:OVITIO>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Objective-To determine how often observer variation in the interpretat ion of intra-arterial angiograms might alter the decision whether or n ot to refer patients for carotid surgery. Methods-A prospective study was carried out in a consecutive series of 99 patients with transient ischaemic attacks and minor strokes. Interpretable angiographic films were available for 179 carotid artery bifurcations. Stenosis of the in ternal carotid artery was measured using mm scales, independently by t hree different radiologists (A, B, and C), using the European Carotid Surgery Trial method. Results-An analysis of the grouped data showed g ood to moderate agreement by kappa statistics for radiologists A upsil on B, B upsilon C, and A upsilon C of 0.68, 0.60, and 0.70 respectivel y. The mean absolute difference in the estimate of stenosis by each of the different radiologists (interobserver variation) was 9.5% and for each radiologist on two separate occasions (intraobserver variation) 8.4%. The degree of observer error was smallest among severely stenose d arteries. Although the absolute differences were small, ((clinically important'' diferences which could change the treatment recommended f rom surgery to no surgery (or vice versa) occurred between radiologist s A and B, B and C, and A and C in: seven (3.9%), six (3.4%), and 11 ( 6.1%) vessels respectively. Conclusions-Because observer variation aff ects all of the imaging methods (Doppler, duplex, contrast arteriograp hy, and MR angiography) used to select patients with transient ischaem ic attack and stroke, these findings are Likely to be widely relevant. Any centre assessing patients with cerebrovascular disease will need to implement strict quality control measures in the interpretation of angiograms (and other vascular imaging procedures) to minimise observe r error and thereby reduce the number of inappropriate decisions made to refer for carotid artery surgery or not.