Hyperthermia is the central feature of neuroleptic malignant syndrome
(NMS), but its etiology remains elusive. Two competing hypotheses impl
icate either hypothalamic dysfunction (inappropriate ''set point'') or
direct myotoxicity (excessive peripheral heat production). These two
models have distinct implications for thermoregulatory activity in NMS
. The first predicts that the individual should respond as to a hypoth
ermic threat or infection (the hypothalamus signals the body to raise
its temperature). The second implies that an excessive heat load is pe
rceived by the hypothalamus, which responds to this hyperthermic threa
t (it signals the body to lower its temperature). To assess the validi
ty of these two hypotheses the thermoregulatory responses of a series
of NMS patients (36 patients, 46 episodes) were examined using standar
d statistical methods. In contrast to normal mammalian thermoregulator
y behavior, thermoeffector responses were not organized into either mo
de, but appeared to function somewhat independently and paradoxically.
We conclude that neither hypothesis is sufficient to explain altered
thermoregulation in NMS, and that the loss of integrated thermoeffecto
r activity may be unique to this disorder.