EFFECT OF PROGESTERONE PRIMING ON GONADOTROPIN-SECRETION AND LUTEAL FUNCTION IN GNRH-TREATED SEASONALLY ANESTROUS EWES

Citation
W. Haresign et al., EFFECT OF PROGESTERONE PRIMING ON GONADOTROPIN-SECRETION AND LUTEAL FUNCTION IN GNRH-TREATED SEASONALLY ANESTROUS EWES, Animal Science, 62, 1996, pp. 97-103
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience","Veterinary Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
13577298
Volume
62
Year of publication
1996
Part
1
Pages
97 - 103
Database
ISI
SICI code
1357-7298(1996)62:<97:EOPPOG>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
The main objective of the experiment was to investigate the mechanism by which progesterone priming eliminates defective luteal function in anoestrous ewes induced to ovulate with GnRH. Animals in group 1 (no. = 10) were primed with a single i.m. injection of progesterone in corn oil 3 days before the start of GnRH treatment, while ewes in group 2 (no. = 10) received corn oil alone and served as untreated controls. E wes in group 3 (no. = 10), which served as positive controls, were tre ated with an intra-vaginal progestagen sponge for 7 days, and this was removed just before the start of GnRH treated. Ewes in all three grou ps were induced to ovulate by administration of 2-h injections of GnRH (250 ng per injection) for 54 h. Frequent blood samples for LH, FSH a nd progesterone analysis were taken around the time of both progestero ne injection and GnRH treatment, as well as daily thereafter to monito r luteal function, and laparoscopy was performed 3 and 7 days after Gn RH treatment. The incidence of ovulation was similar for all the three groups (8/10, 7/10 and 9/10 for groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively). Howe ver, both laparoscopic examination and plasma progesterone concentrati ons revealed that the incidence of normal luteal function was signific antly higher in progesterone-primed animals group 1: 7/8; group 3: 9/9 ) compared with controls (group 2: 0/7), P < 0 . 05) with no differenc e between groups 1 and 3. Injection of progesterone on day-3 significa ntly suppressed mean LH concentrations (P < 0 . 05), but mean FSH conc entrations were not altered. However, there were no significant differ ences between groups in LH and FSH concentrations over the period of G nRH treatment, nor in the timing, duration and height of pre-ovulatory LH and FSH surges. These results suggest that progesterone priming ma y eliminate defective luteal function either by changing LH concentrat ions at file time of progesterone administration or through mechanisms not involving gonadotropin secretion.