DETECTION OF SIMULATED OSTEOPOROSIS IN MAXILLAE USING RADIOGRAPHIC TEXTURE ANALYSIS

Citation
Te. Southard et Ka. Southard, DETECTION OF SIMULATED OSTEOPOROSIS IN MAXILLAE USING RADIOGRAPHIC TEXTURE ANALYSIS, IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, 43(2), 1996, pp. 123-132
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Biomedical
ISSN journal
00189294
Volume
43
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
123 - 132
Database
ISI
SICI code
0018-9294(1996)43:2<123:DOSOIM>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
An effective mass screening tool for detecting osteoporosis is current ly lacking, Alveolar bone, routinely examined during periodic dental e xaminations, may provide a window into the status of systemic bone den sity, The primary objective of this investigation was to compare the p erformance of various textural features, computed from dental radiogra phs, in detecting early simulated osteoporosis of alveolar bone. Five specimens of human maxillary alveolar bone were progressively decalcif ied and the percentage calcium lost at each decalcification stage quan tified, Two radiographs of each specimen, together with an aluminum st epwedge, were exposed at 70 kVp at each stage, The test set of 140 rad iographs was digitized, identical bony regions of interest selected fr om the density-corrected images of each specimen, the regions digitall y filtered to reduce film-grain noise, and textural features computed on a line-to-line basis, Correlation analysis identified a set of feat ures whose changes consistently exhibited a moderate-to-strong linear association with bone mineral loss over a wide range of decalcificatio n. Repeated measures analysis of variance was subsequently applied to this set to measure the minimal decalcification that could be detected by each feature under optimal conditions of x-ray beam angulation (0 degrees) and suboptimal conditions (+/-5 degrees). The best performing features were mean intensity, gradient, Laws' texture energy measures , and fractal dimension which detected 5.7 % bone decalcification at o ptimal beam angulation and 9.4-12.6 % at suboptimal angulation.