GAUCHER DISEASE - CURRENT ISSUES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

Citation
Erb. Mccabe et al., GAUCHER DISEASE - CURRENT ISSUES IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 275(7), 1996, pp. 548-553
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
00987484
Volume
275
Issue
7
Year of publication
1996
Pages
548 - 553
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-7484(1996)275:7<548:GD-CII>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objective.-To provide physicians with a responsible assessment of the diagnosis and treatment of Gaucher disease. Participants.-A nonfederal , nonadvocate, 14-member panel representing the fields of pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, genetics, endocrinology, molecular biology, internal medicine, and biostatistics. In addition, 30 experts in gene tics, pediatrics, neurology, obstetrics and gynecology, orthopedics, h ematology, genetic counseling, clinical pathology, and epidemiology pr esented data to the panel and a conference audience of 230 during a 1 1/2-day public session. Questions and statements from conference atten dees were considered during the open session. Closed deliberations by the panel occurred during the remainder of the second day and the morn ing of the third. Evidence.-The literature was searched through MEDLIN E, and an extensive bibliography of references was provided to the pan el and the conference audience. Experts prepared abstracts with releva nt citations from the literature. Scientific evidence was given preced ence over clinical anecdotal experience. Consensus Process.-The panel, answering predefined questions, developed their conclusions based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and on the scientific literature. The panel composed a draft statement that was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. T hereafter, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. Conclusions.-D espite the success of enzyme therapy, treatment is limited by the cost of the agent. This makes it imperative to determine the lowest effect ive initial and maintenance doses, to define the appropriate clinical indications for treatment, and to establish uniform methods to optimiz e outcome assessment. The value of treatment for asymptomatic individu als has not been determined. General population screening for affected individuals and for carriers is not appropriate at this time. As a pr ototype for all rare diseases, the plight of patients with Gaucher dis ease raises difficult financial and ethical issues, which we as a soci ety must address.