Jh. Hartig et al., TOWARD INTEGRATING REMEDIAL ACTION PLANNING AND FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLANNING IN GREAT-LAKES AREAS OF CONCERN, Fisheries, 21(2), 1996, pp. 6-13
Fishery and water quality agencies both have similar goals of restorin
g degraded fish communities and habitat in Great Lakes Areas of Concer
n (AOCs) using an ecosystem approach. To implement an ecosystem approa
ch and achieve complementary, reinforcing programs will require greate
r coordination and integration. Recommendations include the following:
(1) Priority should be placed on accelerating establishment of lakewi
de fish community objectives for each Great Lake, and local fishery ma
nagers should work within Remedial Action Plan (RAP) teams to set inte
rim, quantitative fish community and habitat objectives or targets for
AOCs that are consistent with lakewide objectives. (2) Senior governm
ent managers and local resource managers should acknowledge the need f
or and promote coordination of RAPs and fishery management planning in
AOCs. (3) Binational efforts should be made to ensure that these inte
rrelated planning efforts are complementary and reinforcing. Ways of a
ccomplishing this include using existing, biennial, binational confere
nces to ensure integration; expanding the terms of reference of an exi
sting binational coordinating committee to ensure integration; or esta
blishing a new binational committee whose terms of reference would ens
ure integration. (4) Where integration and coordination of RAPs and fi
shery management planning have been achieved and have resulted in acti
ons to rehabilitate fisheries and fish habitat, managers should broadl
y communicate how this was accomplished, including leveraging funds.