SUTURE ANCHOR STRENGTH REVISITED

The rapid proliferation of suture anchors continues. Our prior report on the pullout strength of 14 different anchors is supplemented by a s imilar test conducted on 8 additional anchors. Comparative data on mod es of failure and failure strengths (ultimate loads to failure) for th ese new devices are compared statistically with the previously tested anchors. In a fresh never-frozen porcine femur model, 10 samples of ea ch of the additional anchors tested were threaded with stainless steel sutures and inserted into three different test areas (diaphyseal cort ex, metaphyseal cortex, and a cancellous trough). Tensile stress paral lel to the axis of insertion was applied at a rate of 12.5 mm/s by an Instron 1321 testing machine (Instron Corp, Canton, MA) until failure and mean anchor failure strengths calculated. The anchors tested were the Mitek G2 as a control, miniMitek, Mitek Superanchor, Mitek Rotator Cuff anchor (Mitek Products, Westwood, MA), Innovasive Devices Radial Osteal Compression device (Innovasive Devices, Hopkinton, MA), Arthre x Fastak (Arthrex Inc, Naples, FL), Arthrotek miniHarpoon (Arthrotek, Warsaw, IN), Orthopedic Biosystems PeBA 3 and PeBA 5 (Orthopedic Biosy stems, Scottsdale, AZ), and AME 5.5 screw (American Medical Electronic s, Richardson, TX). Failure mode (anchor pullout, suture eyelet cut ou t, or wire breakage) was generally consistent for each anchor type. Th e size of insertion hole is clinically important and each anchor's per formance was evaluated as a function of its minor diameter or drill ho le. For screw anchors, the larger the minor diameter of the screw, the higher the mean failure strengths in all three test areas (P = .001). However, larger drill holes for non-screw anchors resulted in lower m ean failure strengths in cancellous bone (P = .03) and diaphyseal cort ex (P < .005).