The concept of sustainability shows many facets. Ecologists, environme
ntalists, agronomists, sociologists, economists and politicians use it
with different connotations. In addition, the sustainability of land
management systems varies in space, according to climate, soil, techno
logy and societal conditions. Sustainable farming systems vary also in
time, as they evolve and may collapse, frequently together with the c
orresponding sociosystems. Because of its complexity, sustainability i
s difficult to measure directly and requires the use of appropriate in
dicators for assessment. A good indicator is free of bias, sensitive t
o temporal changes and spatial variability, predictive and referenced
to threshold values. Relevant data are often incomplete or inadequate
for indicator implementation. To embrace the whole width of sustainabi
lity, several methods and techniques should be used concurrently, incl
uding land evaluation and coevolutionary, retrospective and knowledge-
based approaches. It is, however, at the application level that major
constraints arise. A sustainable land management system must satisfy a
large variety of requirements, including technological feasibility, e
conomic viability, political desirability, administrative manageabilit
y, social acceptability, and environmental soundness. Real world condi
tions at farm and policy-making levels need to be substantially improv
ed to achieve sustainable land management.