ABNORMAL SYSTOLIC INTRAVENTRICULAR FLOW VELOCITIES AFTER VALVE-REPLACEMENT FOR AORTIC-STENOSIS - MECHANISMS, PREDICTIVE FACTORS, AND PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE
J. Bartunek et al., ABNORMAL SYSTOLIC INTRAVENTRICULAR FLOW VELOCITIES AFTER VALVE-REPLACEMENT FOR AORTIC-STENOSIS - MECHANISMS, PREDICTIVE FACTORS, AND PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE, Circulation, 93(4), 1996, pp. 712-719
Background Dynamic intraventricular flow velocities after valve replac
ement for aortic stenosis have been associated with high in-hospital m
orbidity and mortality. The aims of the present study were to determin
e the mechanisms and preoperative predictors of abnormal flow velocity
(AFV) after valve replacement for aortic stenosis and to assess the c
linical course of patients with AFV after surgery. Methods and Results
One hundred consecutive patients with pure aortic stenosis were studi
ed prospectively before operation by cardiac catheterization and Doppl
er echocardiography. After surgery, intraventricular flow was studied
by Doppler echocardiography at rest, during nipride infusion, and duri
ng dobutamine infusion. AFV (defined as a systolic dagger-shaped Doppl
er spectrum >2 m/s) occurred in 14 patients at rest and in 27 patients
during nipride and/or dobutamine infusion. In most patients, AFV was
associated with left ventricular cavity squeezing. Left ventricular en
d-diastolic diameter, preoperative intraventricular flow velocity and
septal-to-posterior wall thickness ratio by Doppler echocardiography,
and mean transvalvular pressure gradient and ejection fraction by cath
eterization emerged as predictors of resting postoperative AFV. Patien
ts with resting AFV had a higher incidence of dyspnea or hypotension (
64% versus 21%, P<.01) and a longer hospital stay (13.1+/-5.8 versus 1
1.1+/-2.5, P<.05) than patients without AFV. In contrast, at a 1-year
follow-up, no patient with resting AFV died. Conclusions First, AFV oc
curs in 14% of patients at rest after Valve replacement for aortic ste
nosis and can be provoked or worsened by ventricular unloading or inot
ropic stimulation. Second, AFV is related more frequently to cavity sq
ueezing than to systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve apparatus
. Third, a typical pattern (small, hyperdynamic, and asymmetrically hy
pertrophied ventricle) is predictive for postoperative AFV and should
be taken into account for the postoperative management. Finally, the p
resence of AFV at rest is associated with high in-hospital morbidity b
ut good long-term prognosis.