INCIDENCE AND CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF MULTIPLE CONSECUTIVE, APPROPRIATE, HIGH-ENERGY DISCHARGES IN PATIENTS WITH IMPLANTED CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS
J. Villacastin et al., INCIDENCE AND CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF MULTIPLE CONSECUTIVE, APPROPRIATE, HIGH-ENERGY DISCHARGES IN PATIENTS WITH IMPLANTED CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS, Circulation, 93(4), 1996, pp. 753-762
Background Some patients with an automatic implantable cardioverter-de
fibrillator (ICD) suffer multiple appropriate, consecutive, high-energ
y discharges (MCDs) during follow-up. Such events might represent resi
stant ventricular arrhythmias and might have prognostic significance.
Methods and Results Eighty consecutive patients with an ICD were follo
wed up for up to 82 months (mean, 21 +/- 19 months). Thirty-eight pati
ents had survived an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and 42 had recurre
nt ventricular tachycardia. During follow-up, 16 patients had MCD (gro
up A), 26 patients had episodes of single appropriate discharges (grou
p B), and 38 patients had no appropriate discharges (group C). Group A
patients had worse functional status (P=.001), lower left ventricular
ejection fractions (LVEFs) (P=.001), and lower survival rates (log ra
nk, P=.003) than the remaining two groups of patients. Cox analysis sh
owed LVEF (P=.001) to be an independent predictor of MCD. Independent
predictors of death or heart transplant were MCD (P=.001), female sex
(P=.001), age(P=.001), history of cardiac arrest (P=.003), and functio
nal status (P=.003). The only independent predictor of total mortality
was female sex (P=.002). Independent predictors of cardiac death were
MCD (P=.007) and female sex (P=.018). Independent predictors of arrhy
thmic death were age (P=.001), female sex (P=.02), and MCD (P=.023). C
onclusions In patients with an ICD, the development of MCD is an indep
endent predictor of cardiac and arrhythmic mortality. If this finding
is confirmed in larger studies, it may help to identify patients in wh
om other therapeutic alternatives, ie, heart transplantation, should b
e considered during follow-up after ICD implantation.