The increased use of CRT monitors for displaying and controlling stimu
li in studies of surface color poses problems of comparability with da
ta obtained with traditional paper-and-illuminant methods. A review of
comparable studies using the two methodologies revealed that CRT stud
ies tend to report larger contrast effects. To investigate factors tha
t may be responsible for this difference, simultaneous lightness contr
ast was measured using both CRT and paper-and-illuminant presentations
. The spatial distribution of luminance in the whole field of view and
the visual angles subtended by the displays were controlled. The CRT
presentation yielded contrast effects twice as big as those measured f
or a paper surface in a homogeneously illuminated room. However, a pap
er display under Gelb Lighting yielded almost exactly the same effect
size as that measured in the CRT presentation. These results demonstra
te that contrast effects in both modes of presentation are affected by
the spatial distribution of luminance beyond the basic experimental s
timuli.