Objective: To determine in a two-part study whether misalignment betwe
en the patient and the laser scanner is a major source of variability
with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (Heidelberg [Germany] Engineering
). Methods: Three topographic images of the right optic nerve were acq
uired with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in eight patients with glau
coma. The correlations between average cup volume, variability of cup
volume estimates, and direction of imaging were evaluated. Furthermore
, the correlations between average rim volume, variability of rim volu
me estimates, and direction of imaging were evaluated. Next, the optic
nerve cup volume and rim volume estimates of a rabbit's left eye were
compared between three series of five topographic images acquired fro
m three slightly different directions. Results: Average cup volume,var
iability of cup volume estimates, and variability in the direction of
imaging correlated significantly among the patients with glaucoma (mul
tiple R(2)=.95; P<.001). Average rim volume, variability of rim volume
estimates, variability in the direction of imaging, and variability i
n the mean height of the contour line also correlated significantly (m
ultiple R(2)=.88; P=.03). In the rabbit eye, the cup volume and the ri
m volume differed significantly among the three image series (analysis
of variance P<.001 and P=.04, respectively). Conclusion: Misalignment
between the patient and the laser scanner may account for significant
variability with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.