Ec. Kao et al., TORSIONAL BOND STRENGTH AND FAILURE PATTERN OF CERAMIC BRACKETS BONDED TO COMPOSITE RESIN LAMINATE VENEERS, European journal of orthodontics, 17(6), 1995, pp. 533-540
The objectives of this study were to investigate the torsional bond st
rength of ceramic brackets bonded to composite resin veneer laminates
and to human enamel. Microfilled resin veneers were bonded directly to
prepared, etched bovine teeth embedded in epoxy resin. Brackets [Allu
re IV (NSB), Fascination, Starfire TMB, and Transcend 2000] were bonde
d to abraded, acid-etched resin veneers with a light-cured or a chemic
ally-cured adhesive. Brackets were also bonded to human teeth with lig
ht-cured and chemically-cured adhesives for comparison purposes. After
24 hours storage in water, specimens were subjected to torsional stre
ss and the maximum shear stress tau(max), was calculated. The debonded
brackets, the veneer, and enamel surfaces were examined under a stere
omicroscope and a SEM to study the failure modes. Three-way ANOVA with
a Tukey multiple comparisons test revealed significant differences in
bond strengths among bracket types and bonding substrate at P=0.05 le
vel. Highest bond strength was observed in brackets with a combination
of micromechanical retention and chemical adhesion. Significant inter
actions among bracket, substrate (enamel or resin) and mode of cure of
adhesive were observed. Analysis of the failure pattern of brackets r
evealed adhesive and/or cohesive resin failures in all brackets studie
d, while cohesive bracket failures occurred in the single-crystal Star
fire TMB bracket and the polycrystalline Transcend 2000 bracket. Debon
ding ceramic brackets under a steady torsional load caused no substrat
e surface alterations regardless of adhesive used.