S. Midgley et al., WHAT DO GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS AND COMMUNITY MENTAL-HEALTH TEAMS TALK ABOUT - DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF LIAISON MEETINGS IN GENERAL-PRACTICE, British journal of general practice, 46(403), 1996, pp. 69-71
Background. Liaison meetings between psychiatrists and general practit
ioners are now well established. Much has been written about their pur
pose and structure but little about their content. Aim. A study aimed
to describe the clinical focus of meetings between a community mental
health team and general practitioners and the nature of the profession
als' interactions. Method. Audiotapes of six consecutive monthly meeti
ngs between a community mental health team and general practitioners i
n two general practices were analysed. Results. Attendance rates among
professionals were over 70%. Over 90% of discussion time was focused
on patient-centred clinical matters. Almost two thirds of interactions
were focused on patients receiving ongoing joint care; few interactio
ns were devoted to new referrals or to patients who had not been asses
sed. Psychotic patients, although accounting for 15% of referrals, occ
upied 54% of patient-centred discussion time. Most interactions consis
ted of reciprocal information exchange between members of the communit
y mental health team and general practitioners. Conclusion. The high a
ttendance rates indicate that both general practitioners and community
mental health team members considered these meetings as high priority
The steady move towards management of severely ill psychiatric patien
ts in the community rather than in hospital requires close collaborati
on between primary and secondary care teams. The meetings described in
this paper appear to be a simple, manageable and sustainable response
to this need.