Concerning hunting in chimpanzees, cooperation has generally been attr
ibuted to the behaviour of two or more individuals acting together to
achieve a common goal (Boesch and Boesch, 1989). The common goal is of
ten considered as the concrete result of a common action by two or sev
eral individuals. Although this result could be used as a criterion fo
r cooperation, it could also be an outcome due to chance. We suggest t
hat the goal, viewed as a concrete benefit shared by the partners, is
not a requisite of cooperation but rather-a possible consequence of a
common action largely submitted to social constraints. Individuals eng
aged in a cooperative task in order to solve a problem have to exchang
e information to adjust to each other's behaviour. However, evidence o
f communication between partners during simultaneous cooperation is ra
re. An experiment in which two chimpanzees each had to simultaneously
pull a handle to get a fruit was performed. We analysed not only the c
oncrete result of the partners' activity but also what the individuals
took into account before pulling a handle. We tried to specify what t
he chimpanzees learned by means of a series of logical propositions wh
ich we were able to confront the experimental results.