THE EFFECTS OF OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CATALYTIC CRACKING REACTORS ON THE CLOSED-LOOP PERFORMANCE OF LINEAR-MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROLLERS

Citation
L. Kalra et C. Georgakis, THE EFFECTS OF OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CATALYTIC CRACKING REACTORS ON THE CLOSED-LOOP PERFORMANCE OF LINEAR-MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROLLERS, Computers & chemical engineering, 20(4), 1996, pp. 401-415
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Computer Application, Chemistry & Engineering","Engineering, Chemical","Computer Science Interdisciplinary Applications
ISSN journal
00981354
Volume
20
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
401 - 415
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-1354(1996)20:4<401:TEOOCO>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
In closed-loop simulations of the Amoco catalytic cracker under MPC, i t was observed that the step response model identified at a low throug hput operating point provided a better closed-loop performance when us ed on the high throughput operating point than a model identified at t he latter operating point (Kalra and Georgakis, Ind. Engng Chem. Res. 33, 3063, 1994). The present paper reports on further simulation exper iments and analysis that was performed to determine if it is the nonli near nature of the process or deficiencies in model identification tha t caused the unexpected closed-loop behavior. When output error models identified from PRBS signals were used in the MPC algorithm this beha vior was not observed, ruling out that nonlinearities might have been the cause. A closed-loop stability analysis of the process under MPC, with truth models as those derived via PRBS tests, confirms what is se en in simulations. A comparison of the models obtained from the two ty pes of tests indicates that the step tests contained inadequate power to excite frequencies of interest to closed-loop control. Furthermore, the step test data from the high throughput operating point was adver sely affected by the presence of noise cause by the numerical calculat ions in this complex model. The conclusion was that the use of step te sts to directly determine the step response coefficients, as is common ly done, may not in some cases be a safe approach.