CHARACTERIZING THE SECONDARY HYDRATION SHELL ON HYDRATED MYOGLOBIN, HEMOGLOBIN, AND LYSOZYME POWDERS BY ITS VITRIFICATION BEHAVIOR ON COOLING AND ITS CALORIMETRIC GLASS-]-LIQUID TRANSITION AND CRYSTALLIZATION BEHAVIOR ON REHEATING
G. Sartor et al., CHARACTERIZING THE SECONDARY HYDRATION SHELL ON HYDRATED MYOGLOBIN, HEMOGLOBIN, AND LYSOZYME POWDERS BY ITS VITRIFICATION BEHAVIOR ON COOLING AND ITS CALORIMETRIC GLASS-]-LIQUID TRANSITION AND CRYSTALLIZATION BEHAVIOR ON REHEATING, Biophysical journal, 69(6), 1995, pp. 2679-2694
For hydrated metmyoglobin, methemoglobin, and lysozyme powders, the fr
eezable water fraction of between similar to 0.3-0.4 g water/g protein
up to similar to 0.7-0.8 g water/g protein has been fully vitrified b
y cooling at rates up to similar to 1500 K min(-1) and the influence o
f cooling rate characterized by x-ray diffractograms. This vitreous bu
t freezable water fraction started to crystallize at similar to 210 K
to cubic ice and at similar to 240 K to hexagonal ice. Measurements by
differential scanning calorimetry have shown that this vitreous but f
reezable water fraction undergoes, on reheating at a rate of 30 K min(
-1), a glass-->liquid transition with an onset temperature of between
similar to 164 and similar to 174 K, with a width of between similar t
o 9 and similar to 16 degrees and an increase in heat capacity of betw
een similar to 20 and similar to 40 J K-1 (mol of freezable water)(-1)
but that the glass transition disappears upon crystallization of the
freezable water. These calorimetric features are similar to those of w
ater imbibed in the pores of a synthetic hydrogel but very different f
rom those of glassy bulk water. The difference to glassy bulk water's
properties is attributed to hydrophilic interaction and H-bonding of t
he macromolecules' segments with the freezable water fraction, which t
hereby becomes dynamically modified. Abrupt increase in minimal or cri
tical cooling rate necessary for complete vitrification is observed at
similar to 0.7-0.8 g water/g protein, which is attributed to an abrup
t increase of water's mobility, and it is remarkably close to the thre
shold value of water's mobility on a hydrated protein reported by Kimm
ich et al. (1990, Biophys. J. 58:1183). The hydration level of similar
to 0.7-0.8 g water/g protein is approximately that necessary for comp
leting the secondary hydration shell.