LEFT-VENTRICULAR DIASTOLIC RESPONSE TO EXERCISE IN VALVULAR AORTIC-STENOSIS

Citation
C. Movsowitz et al., LEFT-VENTRICULAR DIASTOLIC RESPONSE TO EXERCISE IN VALVULAR AORTIC-STENOSIS, The American journal of cardiology, 77(4), 1996, pp. 275-280
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
00029149
Volume
77
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
275 - 280
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9149(1996)77:4<275:LDRTEI>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Exercise produces profound alterations in symptoms and hemodynamics in patients with valvular aortic stenosis (AS). Prior studies have demon strated marked increases in late left ventricular (LV) diastolic filli ng pressure with exercise. Little information is available on the exer cise response of indexes of early LV diastolic performance. Catheter-t ip manometer recordings in 11 patients with AS and 5 age-matched contr ols were obtained at rest and with supine bicycle exercise at the time of cardiac catheterization. Pressure-derived indexes of LV diastolic performance, isovolumic relaxation rate, and diastolic interval data w ere examined. At rest, early (patients 22 +/- 6 mm Hg, controls 12 +/- 3 mm Hg; p <0.01), minimal (patients 9 +/- 4 mm Hg, controls 4 +/- 1 mm Hg; p <0.01), and late (patients 28 +/- 10 mm Hg, controls 13 +/- 3 mm Hg; p <0.002) LV diastolic pressures were elevated in patients wit h AS. The time to onset of isovolumic relaxation (patients 422 +/- 31 ms, controls 363 +/- 40 ms; p <0.01) arid minimal LV diastolic pressur e (patients 608 +/- 57 ms, controls 448 +/- 52 ms; p <0.002) at rest w ere prolonged in patients with AS. With exercise, early (patients 45 /- 14 mm Hg, controls 15 +/- 3 mm Hg; p <0.002), minimal (patients 15 +/- 6 mm Hg, controls 2 +/- 1 mm Hg; p <0.01), and late (patients 38 /- 10 mm Hg, controls 18 +/- 5 mm Hg; p <0.002) LV diastolic pressures were elevated, and the time to minimal LV diastolic pressure (patient s 528 +/- 26 ms; controls 393 +/- 56 ms) and peak first derivative of LV pressure decline (-LV dP/dt) (patients 395 +/- 41 ms, controls 326 +/- 59 ms) were prolonged in AS. furthermore, patients with AS failed to comparably increase the rate of LV pressure decay and isovolumic re laxation with exercise. The LV diastolic response to exercise in patie nts with AS is distinguished from the control response by suboptimal a nd prolonged relaxation and a diminished rate of LV pressure decay. Th ese abnormal responses in early diastolic function coupled with the kn own abnormal chamber distensibility in AS contribute to significant el evations in early, mid-, and late diastolic pressures with exercise.