The World Health Organisation is attempting to harmonise the processes
of risk assessment worldwide in the hope that assessments performed i
n one country will be acceptable to other countries. This would reduce
not only duplication of work by scientists, but would also reduce to
a minimum the need for animal studies. There are differences in the sc
ientific approaches used in different countries to the process of haza
rd and risk assessment. For example, in the USA risk assessment is foc
using on development of mathematical models to describe dose-response
relationships to define, for example, a benchmark dose. In Europe much
less use is made of such models. More dependence is placed on no-effe
ct levels, and the use of safety factors is much more highly developed
. Political considerations come into play when one looks at the use, o
r misuse, that may be made of such hazard and risk assessments. Once a
chemical has been classified and placed on a 'list' of reprotoxic che
micals, the underlying criteria may be ignored and actions taken which
are quite unjustified by the original scientific evidence.