Ed. Simmons et al., BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF THE DEWAR AND INTERSPINAL CERVICAL-SPINE FIXATION TECHNIQUES, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 21(3), 1996, pp. 295-298
Study Design. This study evaluates and compares the stiffness of two c
ervical spine fixation techniques. Objectives. This biomechanical stud
y was carried out to compare the interspinous and Dewar cervical spine
fixation techniques. Summary of Background Data. Interspinous wiring
is a commonly used method of fixation in the cervical spine. The Dewar
technique is less commonly known and practiced, and clinical experien
ce has suggested that it maybe a more stable technique, Methods. Cervi
cal spine specimens stabilized with the interspinous and ''Dewar'' tec
hniques were biomechanically tested inflexion and in torsion. Stiffnes
s and energy absorption under moderate loads were compared, The Dewar
technique uses contoured double corticocancellous iliac grafts as inte
rnal graft/splints fixed to the spine with threaded pins and wire, The
interspinous technique is a single. interspinous wire loop. Eleven fr
esh human cervical spines were harvested from cadavers. The spines wer
e destabilized at C4-C5 by sectioning all tissue except the anterior l
ongitudinal ligament. Each fixation technique was applied alternativel
y and tested on each spine. Results. In torsion testing (n = 5), the D
ewar fusion was 61% stiffer than the interspinous technique (P < 0.02)
, Dewar: 11.3 N/mm (s.d, 4.9 N/mm) and interspinous: 8.4 N/mm (SD 3.3
N/mm). Inflexion testing (n = 6), the Dewar technique was 35% stiffer
than the interspinous technique (P < 0.10). Dewar: 655.4 Nmm/degree (S
D 293 Nmm/degree) and interspinous: 406.8 Nmm/degree (SD 113.0 Nmm/deg
ree). Energy absorption with the interspinous technique was greater in
flexion (P < 0.10) and in torsion (P < 0.005), indicating more deform
ation with the interspinous technique. There was no statistically sign
ificant difference between the means of specimens tested first and tho
se tested second independently of the fixation technique. Conclusions.
These tests indicate that the Dewar cervical spine fixation is stiffe
r than the single interspinous wire in both flexion and particularly t
orsion, This project is the only biomechanical study of the Dewar tech
nique that we are aware of, and the results support the clinical findi
ngs regarding the effectiveness of this technique.