RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to determine t
he cost-effectiveness of prostate biopsy at different excess prostate-
specific antigen (PSA) levels as a function of age. METHODS. Medical d
ecision analysis was performed with standard software (SMLTREE) to det
ermine marginal effectiveness in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) a
nd marginal cost-effectiveness in dollars per QALY of immediate prosta
te biopsy at different excess PSA levels between 0 ng/mL and 20 ng/mL.
The probability of clinically significant cancer with a positive biop
sy (pD(+)Bx(+)) was assumed to decrease with age from 1.0 at age 50 to
0.2 at age 70, Costs were based on charges at our hospital and were c
onsidered over a 2-year time frame. RESULTS. With our base case assump
tions there was a decrease in QALYs and an increase in costs doing an
immediate prostate biopsy at all excess PSA levels between 0 ng/mL and
20 ng/mL compared with not biopsying the prostate at greater than or
equal to 70 years, Doubling pD(+)Bx(+) from 0.2 to 0.4 in the 70-and-o
lder age group resulted in a small increase in QALYs in biopsying the
prostate at excess PSA levels between 0 ng/mL and 20 ng/mL, However, t
he marginal cost-effectiveness of prostate biopsy was very high, rangi
ng from $275,000/QALY biopsying at an excess PSA level of 0 ng/mL to $
68,000/QALY biopsying at an excess PSA level of 20 ng/mL. This compare
d with it being more effective and less costly to biopsy at all excess
PSA levels greater than or equal to 0 ng/mL in 50-year old patients.
CONCLUSION. Immediate prostate biopsy is not cost-effective and can be
detrimental in patients greater than or equal to 70 years of age at a
ll excess PSA levels between 0 ng/mL and 20 ng/mL.