Mn. Shadlen et al., A COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEURONAL AND BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES TO VISUAL-MOTION, The Journal of neuroscience, 16(4), 1996, pp. 1486-1510
We have documented previously a close relationship between neuronal ac
tivity in the middle temporal visual area (MT or V5) and behavioral ju
dgments of motion (Newsome et al., 1989; Salzman et al., 1990; Britten
et al., 1992; Britten et al., 1996), We have now used numerical simul
ations to try to understand how neural signals in area MT support psyc
hophysical decisions, We developed a model that pools neuronal respons
es drawn from our physiological data set and compares average response
s in different pools to produce psychophysical decisions. The structur
e of the model allows us to assess the relationship between ''neuronal
'' input signals and simulated psychophysical performance using the sa
me methods we have applied to real experimental data. We sought to rec
oncile three experimental observations: psychophysical performance (th
reshold sensitivity to motion stimuli embedded in noise), a trial-by-t
rial covariation between the neural response and the monkey's choices,
and a modest correlation between pairs of MT neurons in their variabl
e responses to identical visual stimuli. Our results can be most accur
ately simulated if psychophysical decisions are based on pools of at l
east 100 weakly correlated sensory neurons. The neurons composing the
pools must include a broader range of sensitivities than we encountere
d in our MT recordings, presumably because of the inclusion of neurons
whose optimal stimulus is different from the one being discriminated.
Central sources of noise degrade the signal-to-noise ratio of the poo
led signal, but this degradation is relatively small compared with the
noise typically carried by single cortical neurons. This suggests tha
t our monkeys base near-threshold psychophysical judgments on signals
carried by populations of weakly interacting neurons; these population
s include many neurons that are not tuned optimally for the particular
stimuli being discriminated.