EFFECTS OF EXERCISE ON LEFT-VENTRICULAR PERFORMANCE DETERMINED BY ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN CHRONIC, SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION SECONDARY TO MITRAL-VALVE PROLAPSE
Md. Tischler et al., EFFECTS OF EXERCISE ON LEFT-VENTRICULAR PERFORMANCE DETERMINED BY ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN CHRONIC, SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION SECONDARY TO MITRAL-VALVE PROLAPSE, The American journal of cardiology, 77(5), 1996, pp. 397-402
Data on the effects of exercise on left ventricular (LV) volumes and e
jection performance in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR)
are limited. With use of a matched-pairs design, 10 asymptomatic patie
nts with chronic, severe MR and normal LV systolic function who were n
ot receiving vasodilator therapy (group 1) and 10 matched normal contr
ol subjects no structural heart disease (group 2) performed symptom-li
mited upright bicycle ergometry with quantitative echocardiographic an
alysis. An additional 8 patients with severe, chronic MR and normal LY
systolic function who were receiving vasodilator therapy at the time
of testing (group 3) were studied for comparison. The 3 cohorts exerci
sed for similar periods of time. Group 1 and 3 patients had similar en
d-diastolic volumes at rest, both of which were significantly greater
than those of normal controls. Although resting LV end-systolic volume
was greater in groups 1 and 3 than in normal controls, the 3 groups h
ad similar relative percent reductions in end-systolic volume during e
xercise (30 +/- 12%, 32 +/- 13%, and 30 +/- 24%; p = NS). A similar pe
rcent increase in LV ejection fraction was also observed in all 3 coho
rts (18 +/- 9%, 15 +/- 9%, and 14 +/- 6%; p = NS). Forward stroke volu
me increased significantly in group 1 (59 +/- 21 and 71 +/- 18 ml; p <
0.001) and in group 3 (59 +/- 17 and 68 +/- 13 ml; p < 0.05). Thus, i
n asymptomatic patients with chronic, severe MR and normal LV ejection
fraction at rest, there is an improvement in LV ejection fraction and
an increase in forward stroke volume during exercise. These effects a
re comparable to those observed in normal controls. Directional differ
ences in the cohort receiving no active therapy were indistinguishable
from either patients receiving vasodilator therapy or normal control
subjects.