INTRAVENOUS SEDATION FOR RETROBULBAR INJECTION AND EYE SURGERY - DIAZEPAM AND OR PROPOFOL/

Citation
Kf. Hampl et al., INTRAVENOUS SEDATION FOR RETROBULBAR INJECTION AND EYE SURGERY - DIAZEPAM AND OR PROPOFOL/, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 40(1), 1996, pp. 53-58
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
00015172
Volume
40
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
53 - 58
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-5172(1996)40:1<53:ISFRIA>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Principle goals of sedation for eye surgery are to provide patient com fort and to allow the patient to stay calm during both retrobulbar inj ection and surgery. Insufficient sedation may not prevent the patient from moving during retrobulbar injection, whereas very deep sedation m ay result in respiratory complications during surgery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and suitability of a c ombination of diazepam and propofol for sedation for both application of retrobulbar block and subsequent elective eye surgery. One-hundred and fifty patients were randomly allocated to receive either diazepam, propofol or a combination of both drugs before retrobulbar injection. Tolerance of retrobulbar injection and comfort during the surgical pr ocedure were assessed by comfort scores using a nominal analogue scale between 1 (worst possible condition) and 6 (best conceivable conditio n). Side effects related to sedation were recorded. The combination of diazepam and propofol resulted in the highest comfort scores for both retrobulbar block (5.3+/-0.3) and the surgical procedure (5.4+/-0.4). Diazepam alone did not produce adequate sedation for retrobulbar bloc k (3.1+/-0.3), whereas comfort scores during surgery were significantl y higher (5.3+/-0.3) compared to propofol alone (3.6+/-0.4). No severe side effects induced by sedation were noted in any of the study group s. The combination of diazepam and propofol proved able to provide a r eliable degree of sedation with minimal side effects for both retrobul bar block and surgery. The combination was clearly superior to the sed ation induced by propofol or diazepam alone.