Study objective: The cost and inconvenience of polysomnography make si
mplified techniques of screening desirable in the strategy of diagnosi
s of sleep apnea syndrome (SAS). We have evaluated, in a prospective s
tudy of 301 consecutive patients referred for suspected sleep disorder
s, an index (Delta index) that detects apneic events by quantifying ar
terial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)) variability. Setting: Regional sleep
laboratory taking referrals from general practitioners and specialist
s. Design: Classic polysomnography was the gold standard, with 15 apne
as plus hypopneas per hour (RDI) being used as a threshold for definit
ion of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Oximetry was recorded over the s
ame night. Signal variability was quantified as a function of time, us
ing digital processing of oximetric data. Sensitivity, specificity, an
d positive and negative predictive values of oximetry testing were cal
culated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was construct
ed representing the comparative courses of sensitivity and 1-specifici
ty at different thresholds of Delta index. Results: Three hundred one
patients were included (age, 56+/-12 years). Their RDI was 30+/-24. Fo
r a Delta threshold at 0.6, the sensitivity of oximetry for the diagno
sis of OSA was 98% and the specificity was 46%. The positive and negat
ive predictive values for diagnosing SAS were 77% and 94%, respectivel
y. The three false-negative cases had a relatively high awake SaO(2) (
97 vs 93.9+/-2.8%), a moderate RDI (23.3+/-1.6), and were less obese t
han the other patients (body mass index: 25+/-3 vs 33+/-8). The 58 fal
se-positive cases had an RDI of 8+/-4, an awake SaO(2) of 93.1+/-3.6 v
s 94.1+/-2.6 for the rest of the population (p=0.01). Finally, the fal
se-positive cases had more airways obstruction (FEV(1)/VC=72+/-13 vs 7
7+/-15%; p=0.026). Using a Delta value of 0.8 leads to a sensitivity o
f 90% with 19 false-negative cases but with a higher specificity of 75
%. Conclusions: A nocturnal oximetry test with a Delta index below 0.6
is helpful in ruling out the diagnosis of SAS in patients being scree
ned for this condition, as this yielded only three negative test resul
ts in 301 screening procedures.