Gpm. Mannes et al., 300 PATIENTS REFERRED FOR LUNG TRANSPLANTATION - EXPERIENCES OF THE DUTCH LUNG TRANSPLANTATION PROGRAM, Chest, 109(2), 1996, pp. 408-413
In November 1990, a lung transplantation program began at the Universi
ty Hospital in Groningen, the Netherlands. As of April 1994, 300 patie
nts were referred for lung transplantation and we investigated the dec
isions that have been made concerning these referrals up to January 1,
1995. The patients were evaluated according to a stepwise procedure.
In stage 1, written information about the referred patients was discus
sed during the weekly, multidisciplinary lung transplantation meeting.
In this stage, 14% of the patients were rejected and 2% were postpone
d. If no major objections for transplantation were identified, the pat
ient was invited for a visit to the outpatient clinic, stage 2. The ne
wly acquired information from that visit was discussed again at the tr
ansplantation meeting. In this stage, 11% of the patients were rejecte
d and 18% postponed. The remaining patients underwent an (partial or c
omplete) inpatient evaluation, stage 3. From all patients about whom a
decision was made in this stage, only 5% were rejected, respectively
35% after partial evaluation and only 1.5% after complete evaluation.
A total of 110 patients (37% of all referred patients) were listed for
lung transplantation, stage 4, Of the listed patients, 20% died while
awaiting an appropriate donor. The group of patients with COPD/emphys
ema had by far the lowest death rate on the waiting list. Patients wit
h short stature (less than or equal to 1.65 m) had a much higher risk
to die on the waiting list compared with patients with longer stature,
42% vs 13%. As of January 1, 1995, 55 patients have undergone transpl
antation, which is 50% of all patients on the waiting list and 18% of
all referred patients. The stepwise selection procedure identifies pat
ients with potential contraindications at an early stage. In this way,
unrealistic expectations and unnecessary examinations, expense, and/o
r hospital admissions may be prevented. Donor shortage, and thus waiti
ng list problems, still remains a significant drawback in the further
development of lung transplantation.