In shifting responsibilities from government to market, privatization
has the potential to alter the institutional framework through which c
itizens normally conceive and pursue their individual and shared inter
ests. But the literature has presented it as a relatively apolitical a
daptation to changing conditions. Rather than a choice among means to
achieve broadly shared goals, privatization often takes the form of a
strategy to realign institutions so as to privilege the goals of some
groups over the competing aspirations of other groups. Drawing primari
ly on the experience of Western, industrialized nations, a political t
ypology is developed that distinguishes between privatizations underta
ken for different reasons-whether pragmatic, tactical, or systemic.