O. Kisker et al., VALUE OF SOMATOSTATIN RECEPTOR SCINTIGRAPHY FOR PREOPERATIVE LOCALIZATION OF CARCINOIDS, World journal of surgery, 20(2), 1996, pp. 162-167
Most carcinoid primary tumors are small and do not cause symptoms unti
l complications (e.g. intestinal obstruction) or symptoms and signs of
the carcinoid syndrome occur. Therefore in most cases an assessment o
f the primary tumor and its metastases must be performed. To determine
the value of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) for localizing
carcinoid tumors, we compared the results of SRS with those obtained w
ith computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in 22 patients w
ho had not undergone surgery for removal of the primary tumor. We coul
d not find an advantage of SRS over CT and US for detecting the primar
y lesions. Tumors > 2 cm in diameter were regularly detected using all
methods. SRS was not superior to CT or US for the detection of liver
metastases. SRS showed the liver metastases in 16 of 18 patients, wher
eas CT and US detected liver metastases in all patients. For localizat
ion of extrahepatic abdominal and extraabdominal metastases (lymph nod
es, bone), whole-body SRS showed an advantage over CT and US. We concl
ude that SRS is not superior to CT or US for localization of primary c
arcinoid tumors or liver metastases, although it did prove successful
for visualizing extrahepatic and extraabdominal tumor spread. Addition
ally, SRS is useful for identifying receptor-positive metastases that
map be treated by somatostatin analogs. Thus SRS should be performed i
n patients with a known carcinoid tumor, except those with an appendic
eal carcinoid measuring < 1 cm in diameter.