ALKENE ROTATION IN [RU(ETA(5)-C5H5)(L(2))(ETA(2)-ALKENE)][CF3SO3] WITH L(2)=IPR- OR PTOL-DIAZABUTADIENE - X-RAY CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF [RU(ETA(5)-C5H5) (PTOL-DAB)(ETA(2)-ETHENE)][CF3SO3]
B. Deklerkengels et al., ALKENE ROTATION IN [RU(ETA(5)-C5H5)(L(2))(ETA(2)-ALKENE)][CF3SO3] WITH L(2)=IPR- OR PTOL-DIAZABUTADIENE - X-RAY CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF [RU(ETA(5)-C5H5) (PTOL-DAB)(ETA(2)-ETHENE)][CF3SO3], Inorganica Chimica Acta, 240(1-2), 1995, pp. 273-284
Reaction of RuCl(pi(5)-C5H5) (pToI-DAB) With AgOTf (OTf= CF3SO3) in CH
2Cl2 or THF and subsequent addition of L' (L' = ethene (a), dimethyl f
umarate (b), fumaronitrile (c) or CO (d)) led to the ionic complexes [
Ru(pi(5)-C5H5) (pToI-DAB) (L')] [OTf] (2a, 2b and 2d) and [Ru(eta 5-C5
H5) (pTol-DAB) (fumaronitrile-N)] [OTf] (5c). With the use of resonanc
e Raman spectroscopy, the intense absorption bands of the complexes ha
ve been assigned to MLCT transitions to the iPr-DAB ligand. The X-ray
structure determination of [Ru(pi(5)-C5H5) (pTol-DAB) (pi(2)-ethene)]
[CF3SO3] (2a) has been carried out. Crystal data for 2a: monoclinic, s
pace group P2(1)/n with a = 10.840(1), b = 16.639(1), c = 14.463(2) An
gstrom, beta = 109.6(1)degrees, V = 2465.6(5) Angstrom(3), Z=4. Comple
x 2a has a piano stool structure, with the Cp ring pi(5)-bonded, the p
Tol-DAB ligand sigma N, sigma N' bonded (Ru-N distances 2.052(4) and 2
.055(4) Angstrom), sind the ethene pi(2)-bonded to the ruthenium cente
r (Ru-C distances 2.217(9) and 2.206(8) Angstrom). The C=C bond of the
ethene is almost coplanar with the plane of the Cp ring, and the angl
e between the plane of the Cp ring and the double bond of the ethene i
s 1.8(0.2)degrees. The reaction of RuCl(pi(5)-C5H5) (PPh(3))(2) with A
gOTf and ligands L' = a and d led to [Ru(pi(5)-C5H5) (PPh(3))(2)(L')]
[OTf] (3a) and (3d), respectively. By variable temperature NMR spectro
scopy the rotational barrier of ethene (a), dimethyl fumarate (b) and
fumaronitrile (c) in complexes [Ru(pi(5)-C5H5) (L(2)) (pi(2)-alkene)]
[OTf] with L(2) = iPr-DAB (1a, 1b, 1c), pTol-DAB (2a, 2b) and L = PPh(
3) (3a) was determined. For 1a, 1b and 2b the barrier is 41.5 +/- 0.5,
62 +/- 1 and 59 +/- 1 kJ mol(-1), respectively. The intermediate exch
ange could not be reached for 1c, and the Delta G(not equal) was estim
ated to be at least 61 kJ mol(-1). For 2a and 3a the slow exchange cou
ld not be reached. The rotational barrier for 2a was estimated to be 4
0 kJ mol(-1). The rotational barrier for methyl propiolate (HC=CC(O)OC
H3) (k) in complex [Ru(pi(5)-C5H5) (iPr-DAB) (pi(2)-HC=CC(O)OCH3)][OTf
] (1k) is 45.3 +/- 0.2 kT mol(-1). The collected data show that the ba
rrier of rotation of the alkene in complexes la, 2a, Ib, 2b and Ic doe
s not correlate with the strength of the metal-alkene interaction in t
he ground state.