S. Ishii et al., IMPLANTATION OF HUMAN COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA CELLS IN THE LIVER STUDIEDBY IN-VIVO FLUORESCENCE VIDEOMICROSCOPY, Clinical & experimental metastasis, 14(2), 1996, pp. 153-164
In vivo fluorescence videomicroscopy (IVFM) was used to analyse the be
havior of weakly and highly metastatic human colorectal carcinoma (CRC
) cells during implantation in the liver. A highly metastatic human CR
C cell line, CX-1, and a weakly metastatic line, Clone A, were double-
labeled with rhodamine B isothiocyanate-dextran (Rd-Dx) to locate cell
s and with calcein AM to assess cell metabolic activity in an experime
ntal metastasis model, Double-labeled CRC cells (2.0 x 10(6)) were inj
ected into the spleens of groups of nude mice and the livers observed
by IVFM over the next 72 h. CRC cells were implanted within 30 s after
injection into either portal venules or the proximal third of hepatic
sinusoids. Approximately 0.5% of CRC cells traversed the liver throug
h portal-central venous shunts and implanted in the lung. The number o
f CX-1 cells in the liver was similar to that of Clone A cells during
the first 12 h, However, more CX-1 cells than Clone A cells remained i
n the liver at 24 h and were in groups of 8-12 cells whereas only a fe
w, single Clone A cells were detected in the liver at 72 h, Not all Cl
one A cells are committed to die within 4 h of implantation because ce
lls harvested 4 h after hepatic implantation proliferated normally in
vitro when removed from the hepatic microenvironment. Since the stress
of mechanical deformation during implantation may cause differences i
n cell survival, CX-1 and Clone A cells were passed through filters wi
th 8 mu m pores in vitro at 10-15 cm of water pressure to recreate the
trauma of hepatic implantation. Approximately 50% of both CX-1 and Cl
one A cells were lysed. Furthermore, both CRC lines remained metabolic
ally active when co-cultivated with liver cells for at least 24 h in v
itro. Thus, the difference in metastatic potential between the two CRC
lines may reside in their response to the combination of mechanical i
mplantation and subsequent growth in the liver parenchyma.