E. Conti et al., CIRCUMSCRIPTION OF MYRTALES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS TO OTHER ROSIDS -EVIDENCE FROM RBCL SEQUENCE DATA, American journal of botany, 83(2), 1996, pp. 221-233
Despite intensive morphological and chemical studies on the Myrtales,
the circumscription of the order remains poorly defined. To test the m
onophyly of Myrtales sensu Dahlgren and Thorne (Annals of the Missouri
Botanical Garden 71: 633-694, 1984), determine the relationships of s
ome controversial families, and identify the most likely sister group
of Myrtales, we conducted parsimony analyses on 80 rbcL sequences repr
esenting 36 taxa from families traditionally included in Myrtales and
44 taxa from other Rosidae. The consensus tree resulting from these an
alyses supports the monophyly of Myrtales and is substantially congrue
nt with the circumscription of the order proposed by Dahlgren and Thor
ne (Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 633-694, 1984), with o
ne notable exception: in the rbcL tree Vochysiaceae are placed in Myrt
ales. A reanalysis of morphological attributes of Vochysiaceae reveale
d that the inclusion of the family in Myrtales is also supported by th
e combined occurrence of two typical myrtalean features of the wood: v
estured pits and bicollateral vascular bundles. Furthermore, our analy
ses excluded Thymelaeaceae, Lecythidaceae, Haloragaceae, and Gunnerace
ae from Myrtales, suggesting that the association of these families wi
th Myrtales, as previously proposed by other authors, may not reflect
common ancestry. Finally, our analyses support a sister group relation
ship between the order Myrtales and a clade formed by an expanded Malv
ales, Sapindales, and an expanded Capparales.