PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES AND PATIENT SURVIVAL IN HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA IN RELATION TO AGE

Citation
Iol. Ng et al., PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES AND PATIENT SURVIVAL IN HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA IN RELATION TO AGE, Journal of surgical oncology, 61(2), 1996, pp. 134-137
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Oncology
ISSN journal
00224790
Volume
61
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
134 - 137
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4790(1996)61:2<134:PFAPSI>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
For hepatocellular carcinoma, the peak age of patients is at the sixth decade. However, the influence of age on the tumor biologic behavior and long-term patient survival is controversial. We retrospectively st udied 278 patients whose hepatocellular carcinomas were surgically res ected to analyze the pathologic and clinical features of the tumors an d patient survival in relation to age. The patients were divided into two groups, younger than 50 years of age and older than 50 years. Nine ty-seven patients were 50 years of age or under, and 181 were older th an 50 years. The younger patients had: (1) more frequent hepatitis B s urface antigen positivity (P = 0.022), (2) less cirrhosis (P = 0.050), (3) less tumor encapsulation, (4) a more advanced tumor stage in term s of more venous permeation (P = 0.012), more liver invasion (P = 0.01 0) and larger tumor (P = 0.002), and (5) a more frequently raised seru m alpha-fetoprotein level (P 0.035). Ln spite of the more advanced sta ge of the tumors, both the actuarial and disease-free survival rates d id not differ significantly from those of the older group. The operati ve mortality rates also were similar in both groups. To conclude, ther e were distinct differences in the clinical and pathologic features of the tumors of patients <50 years and those older. Although the tumors were more advanced in the younger group, the less frequently associat ed cirrhosis in this group might have partly compensated to result in survival rates similar to those of the older,group. Because of the com parable survival rates, the treatment policy in the older group should not differ greatly from that in the younger group. (C) 1996 Wiley-Lis s, Inc.